Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 7, 1980No. 1 CA-CR 4047PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Presiding Judge.
The statute involved in this case provides for certain limited circumstances in which liquor may be sold on credit for on-premises consumption. The question for decision is whether appellant, a tavernkeeper, was denied equal protection of the law when convicted of selling liquor on credit in violation of the statute.
Appellant, Patricia Miller, was charged on October 27, 1978, with a violation of A.R.S. § 4-242(A), selling liquor on credit. A.R.S. § 4-242 provides:
A. It is unlawful for a licensee, or an employee or agent of a licensee, to sell or offer to sell,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BUCCELLATO v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008