Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Drouillard
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 22, 2010No. Case 09-11059PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DR. PAUL DROUILLARD’S MOTION TO DISMISS
VICTORIA A. ROBERTS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs sued the United Parcel Service (“UPS”), Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (“Liberty”) and Dr. Paul Drouillard under the Federal Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. Before the Court is Dr. Drouillard’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 32). Dr. Drouillard seeks dismissal on grounds that the claims against him are barred by the doctrine of witness immunity. On December 22, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to brief whether it should apply the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pollina v. DishongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Carlton B. Parks v. United States, et al.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026