Legal Opinion
City of Kansas City v. Chung Hoe Ku
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2009No. WD 69807PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH P. DANDURAND, Judge.
Chung Ho Ku and Myong Suk Ku (“the Kus”) appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County condemning real estate owned by the Kus. The trial court ruled in favor of the City of Kansas City, Missouri (“the City”). The Kus argue four points on appeal. They claim the trial court erred in entering a judgment of condemnation because: (1) there was no substantial evidence that the City engaged in good faith negotiations before filing a condemnation suit; (2) there was neither substantial evidence nor a factual finding by the court that the City complied with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Healthcare Services of the Ozarks, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Stark Liquidation Co. v. Florists' Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Vinson v. VinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lomax v. SewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri Real Estate Appraisers Commission v. FunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Leonard v. FrisbieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City v. Ivanhoe Neighborhood CouncilMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010