Legal Opinion
United States v. Drury
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 2, 2003No. 02-12924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Circuit Judge:
Dr. Carl M. Drury, Jr. appeals his convictions for using a facility in interstate commerce to effect a murder-for-hire scheme, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958(a), and for possessing a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, in violation of 18 *1093U.S.C. § 924(c). Drury contends that the government failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the jurisdictional element of § 1958(a). In addition, Drury argues that the district court committed reversible error by: 1) instructing the jury that the use of a pay or cellular phone constitutes a per se use of…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. James P. HornadayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Imran MandhaiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- United States v. DruryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.