Legal Opinion

Maycumber v. Wolfe

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank Del Vecchio, J.

This is a motion pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment dismissing a complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, canceling the lien and discharging a notice of lis pendens filed in connection with the action.

It appears from the pleadings and affidavits submitted on the motion that the defendant Robert W. Wolfe entered into a contract with the defendant Robin Construction Corporation whereby the latter was to build a residence for an agreed price of $21,588, part of which was to be financed by the owner’s procuring an $18,000 mortgage. The sum of $1,000 was paid…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Nay v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  5. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lorber v. Eskof Real Estate, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Abe Schild Stone Corp. v. ApostleNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Rochester Smelting & Refining Co. v. Republic Chemical Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API