Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Stein

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 10, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

Tbe complainant, Jobn G. Ingram, filed bis original bill in this canse seeking to recover compensation for bis services as bookkeeper, it being alleged tbat no contract was ever entered into between tbe complainant and tbe defendant Stein as to tbe amount of tbe complainant’s monthly salary and tbat, therefore, tbe fixing of bis compensation should be determined on a basis of quantum meruit; tbat tbe reasonable value of bis services was $50 per month; tbat be worked for tbe defendant six years, drawing approximately $25 per month, in small checks and in merchandise; and tbat there is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weaver v. BoltTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Reed Bros. Stone Co., Inc. v. Pittman Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Myrick v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  2. Frazier v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Huntington v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Olson v. Midstates Freight Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. George Sanders, Individually and d/b/a SMS Contractors, Inc. v. Breath of Life Christian Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API