Legal Opinion

Seehawer v. Magnecraft Electric Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 24, 1989No. 88 C 7102PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Mary Seehawer brings this three-count action charging defendants Magnecraft Electric Co. (“Magnecraft”) and James A. Steinback, Magnecraft’s president, with breach of contract and violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-l et seq. Seehawer moves to strike four affirmative defenses. Defendants move to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment on the breach of contract claim. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Mein v. Masonite CorporationIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lasalle National Bank v. Service Merchandise Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. William H. Moss v. Timothy Martin, Robert Millette, and Brian PiersmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Anders v. Mobil Chemical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Habighurst v. Edlong Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Tolbert v. St. Francis Extended Care CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API