Legal Opinion
Grasty v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 8, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-1594PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HANNUM, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Carlos Grasty initiated this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which HUD refused to accept the assignment of his mortgage on the basis of its conclusion that he did not meet two of the six conditions required by 24 C.F.R. § 203.-650(a).1 Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and defendants HUD, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr. and Joseph Russell.
*913 I. Assignment of Mortgages to HUD
The Secretary of HUD is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. LynnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. RathgensDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madison v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Madison)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pozzie v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Grasty v. US DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVLOP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985