District of Columbia v. Suydam
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
After defendant-appellee and her husband, occupants of a publicly-subsidized housing unit, ceased paying rent, the Dis trict of Columbia government (the District) served them with a statutory notice to vacate. Defendant then informed the District that her husband had left the premises and, as required by regulations, signed a new lease for the unit listing her as the sole head of household and reducing the rent, but otherwise leaving the terms of the previous lease unchanged. Defendant contends that by executing the new lease, the District relinquished its right to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Schwartz v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Burger v. Western Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Housing Resource Group v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Housing Resource Group v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Thornton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- District of Columbia v. ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thornton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994