Legal Opinion
Brown v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1987No. 85-2493PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The plaintiff is a federal prisoner incarcerated in the federal penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. This civil action was commenced when the plaintiff filed a form 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The defendants were all federal employees ranking from the current Attorney General…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ruben Ramirez Sanchez v. H.G. Miller, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Marion, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Jackson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Charles Mendoza v. Harold G. Miller, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Albert E. Taylor v. James Wallace, David Miller, Dolores RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Ricker v. LeapleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William Michael FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Paul Samuel Perveler v. Wayne Estelle, Warden Board of Prison Terms Ron E. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Brown v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.