Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1976No. Docket 25343, 25344, 25345, 26553PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P. J.

I adopt the facts from Judge Cavanagh’s dissenting opinion.

The defendant seeks to withdraw his four guilty pleas. He contends that the plea transcripts do not disclose the entire plea agreement. That portion of the plea agreement not on the record is a purported agreement by the defendant to cooperate with the FBI in certain narcotics investigations. In return for the defendant’s cooperation it is alleged that the FBI agreed to urge the prosecutor to recommend a more lenient sentence.

GCR 1963, 785.7(2)(b) requires that the plea agreement be stated on the record. The purpose for placing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. ShekoskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. HubbardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. RodriguezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RivestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of RhonemusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. People v. ClarkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. RivestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API