Legal Opinion

Pilgrim v. Grant

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 3, 1936No. 3802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HELLENTHAL, District Judge.

Edna G. Pilgrim, the plaintiff, brought this action as a ■co-owner with the defendants O. M. Grant, George Mutchler, David Mutchler and John Mutchler, of the Irishman .No. 1 Lode Claim, situate on the divide between Saint *22Patricks Creek and Happy Creek in the Fairbanks Recording Precinct, Alaska; which lode claim will hereafter be referred to simply as the “Irishman.”

In the amended complaint it is alleged that the defendant Grant commenced mining operations on the Irishman, independent of the plaintiff, on or about January 1st, 1930, and that the rest of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Turner v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Rothwell v. DeweesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Starns v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API