Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1908PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ActioN beard by Guión, J., wbo found tbe facts by consent, at Spring Term, 1908, of CheroKee. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbe plaintiffs and defendant were beirs at law of Charlotte and Henry Smith, and as such inherited the 589 acres of land. Tbe appellant (defendant) was a tenant in common with appellees until the unity of possession was broken by the conveyance of said lands to D. W. Deweese, a stranger, in 1891, by the sheriff, after sale for nonpayment of taxes. Tbe defendant, as one of the tenants in common, resided on the lands and listed them for taxes. His own share was sold with all the other shares, and the whole estate of the “Smith beirs” was transferred to Deweese, the purchaser, wbo brought a suit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Hicks v. . BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Coppinger v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Wilcox v. . LeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stell v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Bailey v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Gentry v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Ruark v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Sutton v. . SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API