State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from a summary judgment holding that a provision in an insurance policy for the subrogation of the insured’s claim for medical payments against a tortfeasor-is valid and not against public policy. Affirmed with costs to respondent.
Subrogation springs from equity concluding that one having been reimbursed for a specific loss should not be entitled to a second reimbursement therefor. This principle has been accepted in the insurance field with respect to property damage, and with respect to medical costs by an impressive weight of authority.1 On the other hand it is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Michigan Medical Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Wilson v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. RaderTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. VaccariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. VaccariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Educators Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
- Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.