Legal Opinion

Greater Providence Deposit Corp. v. Barnacle

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 16, 1993No. 92-415-M.PPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION FAY, Chief Justice.

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island, acting pursuant to Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure, has certified to this court two questions of law, together with a statement of facts relevant to the controversy in which the questions arose. The certified questions arise from two distinct fact patterns.

On December 22, 1986, Sally E. Lapides (Lapides) and her husband, Michael J. Barnacle (Barnacle), executed a promissory note in favor of Greater Providence Deposit Corporation to evidence a loan for the purchase of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Thomas Edward Ryan, Debtor. Peter M. Stern v. Continental Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Town of East Greenwich v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. Tri-County Produce Distributors, Inc. v. Northeast Prod. Cr. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Keese v. BeardsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sandy Ridge Oil Co. v. Centerre Bank National Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BarnacleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API