Legal Opinion

Thomson Industries, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Port Washington North

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1970PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Section 1 of article VIII-A of respondent village’s zoning ordinance prohibits a “ heliport ” as a use in the industrial “A” district in which appellant’s property is located. The Appellate Division held that as ‘ ‘ Fairly construed, the ordinance prohibits the activities which plaintiff’s operations would necessarily entail.” It is clear, however, that the ordinance, being in derogation of common-law property rights, must be strictly construed (440 East 102nd St. Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298, 304). A strict construction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Allen v. AdamiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Garden State Farms, Inc. v. BaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Moriarty v. Planning Board of Village of SloatsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Board of StandardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Brunner v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API