Thomson Industries, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Port Washington North
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Section 1 of article VIII-A of respondent village’s zoning ordinance prohibits a “ heliport ” as a use in the industrial “A” district in which appellant’s property is located. The Appellate Division held that as ‘ ‘ Fairly construed, the ordinance prohibits the activities which plaintiff’s operations would necessarily entail.” It is clear, however, that the ordinance, being in derogation of common-law property rights, must be strictly construed (440 East 102nd St. Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298, 304). A strict construction…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by24 opinions
- Allen v. AdamiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Garden State Farms, Inc. v. BaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Moriarty v. Planning Board of Village of SloatsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Exxon Corp. v. Board of StandardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Brunner v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.