Legal Opinion

People v. Farina

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s plaint, as we read his own inartistically drawn petition for a writ of error coram nobis, is not merely that he was not given the sentence, promised to him by the Trial Judge to induce him to plead guilty, but that'he was coerced by the Judge into entering the plea of guilt. Since the record supports Ms assertion of improper coercion, simply changing the sentence and imposing the one promised does not meet the necessities of this case. The defendant is entitled to an order, such as the Appellate Division granted, setting aside the judgment of conviction entered on his coerced plea…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Elksnis v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. United States v. TateoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. People v. EaregoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. The PEOPLE v. DarrahIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API