Legal Opinion
Didio v. Chess
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 19, 1995No. A95A1043PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Harold Chess filed a complaint against his former attorney, defendant Steve Didio, alleging that Didio had fraudulently withheld the proceeds of an insurance settlement from him. The trial court struck Didio’s answer to the complaint following his failure to comply with a discovery order the trial court had issued. In his sole enumeration of error, Didio contends that the trial court abused its discretion in striking his answer. We disagree and affirm.
On October 22, 1993, Chess served Didio with interrogatories. When Didio failed to respond to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schrembs v. Atlanta Classic Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Swindell v. SwindellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Bryant v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Johnson v. Lomas Mortgage USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sterling Factors, Inc. v. WhelanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- General Motors Corp. v. ConkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Howard v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Potter v. American Medcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Revels v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.