Commonwealth v. Peronace
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
Appellant stands convicted of two homicides, the killing of his wife and his father-in-law, Vito Mariello. The two indictments were tried together. The jury decided that the murders were of the first degree and that the penalty should be death; appellant was accordingly sentenced.
Differences had arisen between the condemned and his father-in-law and his wife. She was living apart from her husband in her father’s house. On the day of the tragedy, about noon, the father-in-law, the wife and her small brother, aged eleven, left the house in which they resided and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WinterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. GelfiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Commonwealth v. LockardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Commonwealth v. BentleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. PatskinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GibbsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.