Legal Opinion
Metzner v. D.H. Blair & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1988No. 87 Civ. 1560 (KC)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
This action is before the court a second time. The late Honorable Edward Weinfeld dismissed almost all the claims plaintiffs asserted in their original complaint, and simultaneously granted them leave to amend. See generally Metzner v. D.H. Blair & Co., 663 F.Supp. 716, 719-22 (S.D.N.Y.1987). Plaintiffs amended their complaint; all defendants except Lena Berger 1 move to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to allege fraud with particularity, Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be based, Fed.R. Civ.P.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- McAllister v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Bissell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.