Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aronov v. Napolitano

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 13, 2009No. 07-1588Published

1Dissent

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge,

with whom

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority narrowing the class of plaintiffs who can obtain attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). With its strangely dismissive view of a decision of the district court explaining why Aronov is a prevailing party, the majority refuses to accord that status to an immigrant who, facing a substantial delay in the processing of his application for naturalization, exercised his statutory right to sue the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”)…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API