Legal Opinion
Harness v. AngioDynamics, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 28, 2021No. 1:21-cv-10233Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * DAVID HARNESS, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * Civil Action No. 21-cv-10233-ADB ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. and NAVILYST * MEDICAL, INC., * * Defendants. * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Plaintiff David Harness alleges that he was injured by a defective medical device made by Defendants AngioDynamics, Inc. (“AngioDynamics”) and Navilyst Medical, Inc. (“Navilyst,” and, together with AngioDynamics, “Defendants”). [ECF No. 1-3]. Currently before the Court are Mr. Harness’ motion for remand, [ECF No. 17], and Defendants’ motion to dismiss for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.