Legal Opinion
McCadden v. West End Building & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 19, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Perskie.
It is not contended that there is no sufficient basis in the evidence for the finding that the enucleation of the employee’s eye was due to the industrial accident; and we have not considered that question.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Fetter, Poetes, Colte, Deae, Wells, WolfsKetl, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Iacone v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Heidel v. Wallace & TiernanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Old Dominion Stevedoring Corp. v. O'HearneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Shuler v. EASTERN FOUNDRY, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.