Pettit v. Management Guidance, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*835OPINION
2Per curiam
Pursuant to NRS 80.210,1 the district court dismissed respondent’s complaint for damages arising out of an alleged breach of contract on the grounds that respondent, a California corporation, had not, at the time of the commencement of the suit, qualified to do business in Nevada. The district court, aware that the relevant statute of limitations, see NRS 11.190(1 )(b), had not run and aware that respondent corporation was in the process of effecting compliance with NRS 80.010 et seq, Nevada’s qualifying statutes, ordered the dismissal to be without prejudice. Cf. League to Save Lake…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Lawler v. GinochioNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Scott v. Day-Bristol Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
4Cited by2 opinions
- Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. BoylesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Williams v. WolffDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981