Legal Opinion

Pettit v. Management Guidance, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1979No. 10914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*835OPINION

2Per curiam

Pursuant to NRS 80.210,1 the district court dismissed respondent’s complaint for damages arising out of an alleged breach of contract on the grounds that respondent, a California corporation, had not, at the time of the commencement of the suit, qualified to do business in Nevada. The district court, aware that the relevant statute of limitations, see NRS 11.190(1 )(b), had not run and aware that respondent corporation was in the process of effecting compliance with NRS 80.010 et seq, Nevada’s qualifying statutes, ordered the dismissal to be without prejudice. Cf. League to Save Lake…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lawler v. GinochioNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Scott v. Day-Bristol Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. BoylesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Williams v. WolffDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API