Hankey v. Hankey
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Blake Hankey appeals from a district court order denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility. We reverse and remand, concluding Blake Hankey established a prima, facie case for modification, warranting an evidentiary hearing.
I
[¶ 2] The parties divorced in October 2011. Jill Hankey was awarded primary residential responsibility of the parties’ minor child, L.C.H., who was born in 2009, subject to Blake Hankey’s right of parenting time, and the parties were awarded joint decision-making responsibility.
[¶ 3] In April 2014, Blake Hankey sought to modify…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sweeney v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Ehli v. JoyceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Lechler v. LechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Kerzmann v. KerzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Gomm v. WinterfeldtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Baker v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Zittleman v. BiblerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.