Legal Opinion

Nettograph MacH. Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911No. 657PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Court; J. H. Everest, Special Judge. Action by the Nettograph Machine Company against A. J. Brown and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

. TURNER, C. J.

On March 6, 1904, the Nettograph Machine Company, plaintiff in error, sued Jennie Brown and A. J. Brown, in the county court of Oklahoma county, on their one certain promissory note, dated September 24, 1903, for $600, payable 90 days thereafter, together with interest and attorney’s fees. Before issue joined E. C. Trueblood, administrator of the estate of said Jennie, was made a party plaintiff. Considering only certain paragraphs not eliminated by demurrer, defendants, after general denial, for answer admitted the execution of the note, but for defense thereto pleaded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. WeldonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Comings v. LeedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Kennebrew v. Southern Automatic Electric Shock Machine Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Arnold v. WiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Herman v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Holcombe & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Wallace v. L. D. Clark & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Roudebush v. Colonial Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API