Legal Opinion

Provo Reservoir Co. v. Tanner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1926No. 4358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The respondents have interposed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon various grounds, among which is the following:

“That the appeal attempted to he taken by the above-named defendant, Caleb Tanner, was not perfected within six months after, the notice of overruling motion for a new trial, in that no undertaking on appeal was filed within said six months, and no undertaking on appeal was filed within five days after the service of notice of appeal in said court, and the order entered by the above-entitled court on the 27th day of August, 1925, permitting said defendant to then file his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Woods v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Fuller v. FerrinUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rogers v. McCartneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Utah Coal & Lumber Restaurant, Inc. v. Outdoor Endeavors UnlimitedUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Buttrey v. Guaranteed Securities Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. U.S. Realty 86 Associates v. Security Investment, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Moser v. LundahlUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Fisher v. BylundUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API