People v. Statley
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
Convicted on a charge that she had failed to yield the right of way to a pedestrian in a crosswalk, the defendant contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because the trial court failed to give her requested instruction that “under the laws of this State, a married woman is not capable of committing a misdemeanor while acting under threats, command or coercion of her husband.” In support of her contention the defendant advances three arguments: (a) the instruction embodies a correct principle of law; (b) it was called for in this case by direct evidence that she was acting…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Commonwealth v. GalloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Harry Taylor, Peter A. Calus, James W. Brewster, William J. Langston and H. C. Greer v. L. B. Fee, and State of California, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- People v. StatleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960