Legal Opinion

People v. Statley

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided April 28, 1949No. Crim. A. No. 2462PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Convicted on a charge that she had failed to yield the right of way to a pedestrian in a crosswalk, the defendant contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because the trial court failed to give her requested instruction that “under the laws of this State, a married woman is not capable of committing a misdemeanor while acting under threats, command or coercion of her husband.” In support of her contention the defendant advances three arguments: (a) the instruction embodies a correct principle of law; (b) it was called for in this case by direct evidence that she was acting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Commonwealth v. GalloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harry Taylor, Peter A. Calus, James W. Brewster, William J. Langston and H. C. Greer v. L. B. Fee, and State of California, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. People v. StatleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API