Legal Opinion

People v. Statley

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

91 Cal.App.2d Supp. 943 (1949)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

CORA ELIZABETH STATLEY, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

April 28, 1949.

T. Ed Scarborough for Appellant.

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Donald M. Redwine, Assistant City Attorney, and Walter C. Allen, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

BISHOP, J.

[1] Convicted on a charge that she had failed to yield the right of way to a pedestrian in a crosswalk, the defendant contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because the trial court failed to give her requested instruction that "under the laws of this State, a married…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Commonwealth v. GalloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harry Taylor, Peter A. Calus, James W. Brewster, William J. Langston and H. C. Greer v. L. B. Fee, and State of California, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API