Rosovich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted the petition of the claimant, Jim M. Rosovich, to review a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the administrative law judge in denying Rosovich’s petition to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
We must determine on appeal whether the administrative law judge abused his discretion in denying claimant’s request for a further hearing on claimant’s motion to reopen.
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Claimant suffered a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Waller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Raymer v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- Horan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Gardner v. Edward Gardner Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- K Mart Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984