Legal Opinion

Rosovich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1982No. 16077-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted the petition of the claimant, Jim M. Rosovich, to review a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the administrative law judge in denying Rosovich’s petition to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must determine on appeal whether the administrative law judge abused his discretion in denying claimant’s request for a further hearing on claimant’s motion to reopen.

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Claimant suffered a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Waller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Raymer v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Horan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. Gardner v. Edward Gardner Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. K Mart Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API