Legal Opinion

Mustas v. INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1963Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 Wis.2d 194 (1963)

MUSTAS, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant and Appellant:

F. ROSENBERG ELEVATOR COMPANY and another, Impleaded Defendants and Respondents.[*]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 4, 1963.

March 5, 1963.

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Ray T. McCann of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Harry Mustas there was a brief by Thomas P. Maras, attorney, and Otjen, Philipp & McFadyen of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. E. J. Philipp, Jr., and Mr. Maras.

For the respondent F. Rosenberg Elevator Company there was a brief by…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Jacobs v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API