TM Delmarva Power, L.L.C. v. NCP of Virginia, L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentJustice Lacy
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion in this case.
This case presents an issue of first impression for the Supreme Court of Virginia: whether contractual language permitting one party to pursue arbitration constitutes the parties’ written agreement to arbitrate their disputes upon the election of either party.
“[Arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.” AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986); see also Doyle & Russell, Inc. v. Roanoke…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Bankers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- J. C. Bonnot, D/B/A Bonnot Construction Company v. Congress of Independent Unions Local 14Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.