Legal Opinion · Dissent

TM Delmarva Power, L.L.C. v. NCP of Virginia, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 2002No. Record 010024Published

1DissentJustice Lacy

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion in this case.

This case presents an issue of first impression for the Supreme Court of Virginia: whether contractual language permitting one party to pursue arbitration constitutes the parties’ written agreement to arbitrate their disputes upon the election of either party.

“[Arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.” AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986); see also Doyle & Russell, Inc. v. Roanoke…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Bankers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. J. C. Bonnot, D/B/A Bonnot Construction Company v. Congress of Independent Unions Local 14Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API