Legal Opinion
Christopher Underwood et al. v. Coinbase Global, Inc. et al.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 7, 2025No. 1:21-cv-08353Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTOPHER UNDERWOOD et al., Plaintiffs, 21 Civ. 8353 (PAE) -v- ORDER COINBASE GLOBAL, INC. et al., Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This decision resolves a discovery dispute. Plaintiffs have moved to compel Coinbase Global, Inc. and Coinbase, Inc. (collectively, “Coinbase”) to designate and produce a witness, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6), to testify for up to two hours as to a topic on which, according to plaintiffs, Coinbase’s previous designee was unprepared to testify. Dkt. 130. Coinbase has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Fitch, Inc., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, American Savings Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Kyoei Fire & Marine Insurance v. M/V Maritime AntalyaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.