Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Ferguson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1936No. 6181Published

1Dissent

GIVENS, C. J.,

Dissenting. — The sole question confronting this court is whether or not intervener’s complaint in intervention was timely made.

I. C. A., section 5-322, provides:

“Any person may, before the trial, intervene in an action or proceeding, who has an interest in the matter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both. An intervention takes place when a third person is permitted to become a party to an action or proceeding between other persons, either by joining the plaintiff in claiming what is sought by the complaint, or by uniting with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Denton v. DetweilerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mendini v. MilnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McDonald v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API