Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pasulka v. Koob

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 9, 1988No. 3-87-0335Published

1DissentJustice Lund

I dissent as to the trial court’s determination finding no general plan. I would reverse the rulings denying admission into evidence of the deeds representing the purchase of lots in Timber Lane Estates and photographs of the houses in Timber Lane Estates. I would also specifically provide that the determination of the existence of a general plan is not conditioned on the existence of a platted subdivision.

Our brethren in the Second District correctly stated the law as to enforcement of restrictions in Osinski v. Collins (1980), 85 Ill. App. 3d 198, 201, 406 N.E.2d 183, 186-87:

“Those who seek…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hays v. St. Paul Methodist Episcopal ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Housing Authority of Gallatin County v. Church of GodIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wiegman v. KuselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Henricks v. BowlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. Punzak v. DelanoIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API