Legal Opinion

Henricks v. Bowles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1959No. Gen. 47,474PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs filed a claim for an injunction to restrain the defendant from constructing a gasoline service station. A Master in Chancery recommended that the complaint be dismissed. The chancellor sustained exceptions to the Master’s report and entered a decree permanently enjoining the defendant from constructing a gasoline service station on the premises. The defendant appeals.

The unrecorded subdivision in which the lots of the parties are located was platted by the original sub-divider in 1941 into 32 lots. Every lot was conveyed by the subdivider, subject to identical restrictive…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Star Brewery Co. v. PrimasIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ewertsen v. GerstenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Miller v. RidgleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Eckhart v. IronsIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Staley v. MearsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pasulka v. KoobAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Sadler v. CreekmurAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Watts v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Cornell v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Varney v. FletcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API