Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Cadwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1925No. 15646PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This cause comes here on appeal from the common pleas court of Tulsa county, Okla., anti arose when plaintiffs in error, L. N. Ewing and B. G. Hastings, who were plaintiffs below, filed their action alleging that they were the owners of certain residence property in `the city of Tulsa which they had ~reuted to the defendants, B. F. Oadwell and Mrs. B. F. Oadwell, and that defendants were indebted to them in the sum of $109 as one month's iental on said prop-

Defendants filed their answer, alleging that they had rented `the property flt.om plaIntiffs under a parol agreement, and after they had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Every v. OggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bush v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Noe v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Wagoner v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Rogers v. MeiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Alfe v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Price v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API