Legal Opinion

Ackerley Communications of Massachusetts, Inc. v. City of Somerville

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 16, 1990No. 88-1802PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PETITION FOR COUNSEL FEES AND COSTS

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Ackerley Communications of Massachusetts seeks an award of approximately $115,000 in attorney’s fees and expenses, under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, for its largely successful appeal in a case challenging the constitutionality of a sign ordinance enacted by the City of Somerville. See Ackerley Communications v. Somerville, 878 F.2d 513 (1st Cir.1989).

Both parties agree that Ackerley is entitled to an award of a “reasonable attorney’s fee” and expenses as a prevailing party in the underlying civil rights case. See generally Hensley…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts, Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  3. Donald Pearson v. Michael FairCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. McLaughlin Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Boston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  5. Parker v. Town of SwanseaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API