Legal Opinion

State v. Ermels

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2006No. 76665-7PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Joshua James Ermels pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the second degree after he stomped on the head of an unconscious victim and the man later died. As part of his plea agreement, Ermels stipulated to facts supporting an exceptional sentence based on victim vulnerability, and he stipulated that there was a legal basis for an exceptional sentence. He also specifically waived his right to appeal the basis for and propriety of an exceptional sentence. Ermels nevertheless argued to the Court of Appeals, after Blakely v. Washington was decided, that he had not knowingly, intelligently, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. SuleimanWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re ShaleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of ShaleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. ErmelsWashington Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API