Legal Opinion

Tri City Broadcasting Co. v. Howell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1968No. Appeal, No. 29PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal from a decree of the court below perpetually enjoining and restraining appellants from interfering with or obstructing the use of a certain 20 foot Way by appellee, its agents, employees, or business invitees.

The particular land involved is a three acre tract of land purchased by appellants on September 2, 1942, and located in North Versailles Township, Allegheny County. The land abuts Foster Road and Naysmith Road with a 20 foot Way running through the land from Naysmith Road, ending at the land of appellee, a distance of 225 feet. Appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milford Borough v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Coffin v. Old Orchard Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Phila. v. Thomas's HeirsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Dormont Borough AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Radnor Township Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Borough of Lehighton v. KatzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Elliott v. H. B. Alexander & Son, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Keifer AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Lillo v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API