Legal Opinion

Andrews Bros. of California v. Central Produce Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1953No. 11653PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant instituted a reparation proceeding pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, as amended, Title 7 U.S.C.A. § 499a et seq. Following the decision of the administrative agency set up by that Act, appellant instituted an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in which the District Judge concurred in the findings of fact of the designated officer of the Secretary of Agriculture, who filed findings of fact, conclusions and an order from which both the appellant and the appellee appealed to the District Court seasonably…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Ernest E. Fadler Co. v. HesserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Harvey v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florida Fruit Sales, Inc. v. Kingfisher GrovesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API