Legal Opinion

People v. Hinman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1967No. Crim. 12608PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Defendant was charged in five counts with soliciting Leonard Amabile to commit the crime of murder, each count charging a solicitation on a different date. A motion to dismiss, under section 995 of the Penal Code, was denied; defendant pled not guilty. After a trial by jury, he was found guilty on all five counts. A motion for a new trial was made and denied; probation was denied; he was sentenced to state prison on count I, no sentence being imposed on the other four counts. Defendant has appealed.

I

We consider, first, the contention that the trial court had lost jurisdiction to try defendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. AmataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. AmataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. ChatfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API