Legal Opinion

Razavi v. Shackelford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 2003No. A02A2102PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Ehsan Razavi and Ingrid Trivino appeal the grant of summary judgment to Frank Shackelford in his action seeking the cancellation of real property liens filed by Razavi.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

So viewed, Razavi and Trivino filed 14 “affidavits for recording”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Burns v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Watson v. Sierra Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Bagwell-Hughes, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Artrac Corp. v. Austin Kelley Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perry Golf Course Development, LLC v. HOUS. AUTH. OF CITY OF ATLANTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. ROBERTS Et Al. v. SMITHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Massih v. MullingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Jimenez v. Gilbane Building Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Botterbusch v. Preussag International Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API