Legal Opinion
Espinosa v. City and County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 2010No. 08-16853PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
598 F.3d 528 (2010)
Kathleen ESPINOSA, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of decedent Asa Sullivan; Asa Sullivan; A.S., by and through his Guardian ad Litem; Nicole Guerra, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; Heather Fong, in her capacity as Chief of Police, Defendants, and
John Keesor, Police Officer; Michelle Alvis, Police Officer; Paul Morgado, Police Officer, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 08-16853.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009.
Filed March 9, 2010.
Peter J. Keith, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sara Lowry v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Koistra v. Cnty. of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Sara Lowry v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Merritt Sharp, III v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017