Legal Opinion
Booth v. Booth
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1929No. Docket No. 6662PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff, Charles Stuart Booth, and defendant, Lola Warrington Booth, are husband and wife. Plaintiff commenced this action for divorce. The defendant asked for separate maintenance. The court denied the divorce and granted the defendant separate maintenance in the sum of $125 per month. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. He does not complain of the judgment in so far as it denies him a divorce, but only that portion thereof granting the defendant separate maintenance.
The record discloses the following facts: The complaint alleges a cause of action on the ground…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Velten v. CarmackOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Jacobs v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monroe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Shibley v. ShibleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Lucich v. LucichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Parnay v. ParnayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.