Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1899No. Sac. No. 453PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. William 0. Minor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action for divorce. Plaintiff having died pending the appeal, her heirs-at-law have been substituted as parties plaintiff and the litigation continued, certain property rights being involved. The complaint attempts to allege two grounds of divorce, namely, willful neglect and extreme cruelty. A general demurrer to both causes of action was overruled, and, upon issue made, judgment went for plaintiff, the court finding in her favor upon both counts. The prop*652erty involved consists of a homestead upon community, an undivided two-tliirds of which was awarded to plaintiff, and .the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Kirschner v. DietrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fleming v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Maloof v. MaloofCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McCahan v. McCahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Hite v. Mercantile Tr. Co. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API