Legal Opinion

Parks & Hull Appliance Corp. v. Reimsnyder

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 29, 1939No. [No. 43, October Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

In the month of January, 1936, Charles Rudolph Reimsnyder, the appellee, was employed by the Parks & Hull Appliance Corporation, one of the appellants, as a helper in the employer’s business as a distributor for Westinghouse refrigerators and electrical appliances. During the spring and summer of that year the principal work of Reimsnyder was that of delivering and installing refrigerators, and in servicing or performing general work in connection with them.

The mechanism of the refrigerant is sealed and in one unit, and in event of the failure of the unit to function, it was necessary to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Carmine v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Alexander v. WalterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  5. Rodgers v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. East Coast Freight Lines, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Bayshore Industries, Inc. v. ZiatsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Wright v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Hamlin MacHine Co. v. Holtite Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Webb v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API