Legal Opinion
Harold v. Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1983PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*530OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur W. Lonschein, J.
These consolidated matters concern the early history of Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc. (hereinafter the corporation). This corporation was organized under the laws of New York by three Californians; the petitioner-plaintiff Hal Taines, Gene Barry, and Michael Rafton, who became equal shareholders. Their intent was to exploit a revolutionary one-hour photo-finishing process, then in its infancy.
The strategy adopted by the corporation was to develop and operate a chain of one-hour photo-processing retail stores in the New York metropolitan…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Ferguson v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. BadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Dissolution of Gordon & Weiss, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Columbia Management Co. v. WyssCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Gimpel v. BolsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- River Management Corp. v. Lodge Properties Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Langer v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.