Legal Opinion
Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Bade
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 1975PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.
This proceeding was brought pursuant to section 623 of the Business Corporation Law to fix the fair value of the stock of respondent stockholders, who had dissented from a proposed merger as a result of which petitioner Endicott Johnson Corporation was to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of McDonough Corporation. Special Term, confirming and adopting the report of the appraiser it had appointed, fixed, inter alia, the fair value of the common stock at $45.75. The Appellate Division having modified the order of Special Term by reducing the valuation of the stock to $42.77 per share and having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re SeaichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Matter of SeaichNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Alpert v. 28 Williams Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- J. Richard Dirose v. Pk Management Corp., Nicholas A. Demare, Frank Ciccarelli, John S. Russo, Harry Kursh, Anthony Curatolo and Jerome DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,877 Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. v. Tiger International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.