Legal Opinion

Standard Furniture Co. v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1905No. 5252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King’ county, Morris, J., entered March 21, 1904, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, after a trial on tbe merits before tbe court without a jury, in an action of replevin.

1Per curiam

Respondent, by conditional bill of sale, sold and delivered to appellants certain furniture. Said bill of sale provided that tbe title to said property should *583remain in respondent, and that, in ease of nonpayment of any of the payments, the full amount should become due, and respondent should be permitted to immediately take possession of said property, without making any demand therefor. Appellants having failed in some of their payments, this action was commenced by the filing of a complaint, setting forth two causes of action—the first, for the recovery of the amount due, and the other,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Driver v. GallandWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. O'Brien v. Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Haas v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Alaska Junk Co. v. McPherson, Fenstamaker, Whitehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Higashi v. VerstandigWashington Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API